At first sight… As I mentioned above, it’s not because someone is interested in the outdoors that they have been neglected. Imagine we can find out where the client fits in, then at first sight our job becomes slightly easier. Gottfredson seems to take the view that to some extent at least (genetic influence and wider social influence) the way children develop their career learning is not uniquely linked to the parent-child relationship. Roe seems to conclude that children respond to the example message the parent conveys on them in their behaviour and attitude. The categorisation of the child’s career focus both conclude is therefore very different. Gottfredson also argues for a genetic and social influence on child development whereas Roe bases the ‘career thinking’ of the child on the relationship with the parent. Roe’s starting point is focused on the emotional/functional relationship between parent and child whereas Gottfredson’s focus is entirely on learning by the child with the parent as a focus for career development. To come back to Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise the conclusions Linda Gottfredson draws are very different to Roe, but so is her starting point.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |